Allu Arjun’s court appearance in Sandhya Theater Stampede case adjourned till July 29

‘Raka’ is old Allu Arjun Mormantik Sandhya made a virtual appearance in the Nampally Criminal Court on Monday, July 6, 2026 regarding the theater stampede case. Legal proceedings were triggered due to a chaotic crowd during the premiere screening of his blockbuster film Pushpa: The Rule in Hyderabad, which tragically left a 35-year-old woman, Revathi, dead and seriously injured her young son. The Chikkadapally police filed a comprehensive chargesheet against 23 people and officially named the National Award-winning actor as accused No. 11; Accused 1 to 10 in theater management.

garlic Arjuna will be demonstrated through video conference

According to a report by IANS, Allu Arjun attended the hearing through video conferencing. The legal team also said that the other two accused were absent and would file an absence plea. After the hearing, the court adjourned the hearing of the case till July 29.

What was the incident of trampling?

Unexpectedly, there was a stampede at the Sandhya theater where a huge crowd had gathered to watch the actor, resulting in the death of 35-year-old Revathi and her eight-year-old son was seriously injured. Earlier, on June 22, the Nampally criminal court adjourned the hearing till July 6 after some accused failed to appear before the magistrate. During that hearing, Allu Arjun virtually did not appear, and his lawyer filed an absentee plea on his behalf.

The police filed a charge sheet

Chikkadpally police named Allu Arjun as accused number 11 in the case. The management of Sandhya Theater has been listed as accused Nos. 1 to 10. The Nampally court issued summons to 19 accused persons. The police have also filed a charge sheet against 23 people in this incident. After the tragic incident, financial assistance was announced to the family of the victim. Film producer Allu Arvind 2 crores will be given to help Revathi’s family. The legal case is ongoing now, with the next hearing scheduled for July 29.Disclaimer: Information in this report is based on legal hearings reported by third-party sources. The details provided represent allegations made by the parties involved and are not proven facts. The case is ongoing, the final decision has not been made. The publication does not claim that the allegations are true.