‘Salman Khan is not God. He is not my godfather. He can’t stop me’: ‘Kaala Hiran’ director defends ‘blue bracelet’ claim amid Delhi High Court case |


'Salman Khan is not God. He is not my godfather. He can't stop me': 'Kaala Hiran' director defends 'blue bracelet' claim amid Delhi High Court case
‘Salman Khan is not God. He is not my godfather. He can’t stop me’: ‘Kaala Hiran’ director defends ‘blue bracelet’ claim amid Delhi High Court case

The controversy surrounding ‘Kaala Hiran: The Battle for Legacy’ is intensifying every day. The film is inspired by the events associated with 1998 Blackbuck poaching caseA striking resemblance between its teaser and its lead characters has already sparked controversy and Salman Khan. Under increasing scrutiny, filmmakers India S Sreena Confronted criticism and defended his creative choices.Discussions gained momentum after veteran actor Govinda Namdev publicly distanced himself from the project, claiming that he was unaware of the film’s true content. India, however, rejected that narrative, saying the actor was fully informed while making it.

The director protects the bracelet reference

One of the most talked about elements of the teaser of ‘Kaala Hiran: The Battle for Legacy’ is the appearance of actor Kashif Iqbal Khan. Ayan KhanA character that many viewers think resembles Salman Khan. Adding to the comparison is the fact that turquoise bracelets are often associated with Bollywood superstars.Addressing the issue, Bharat dismissed suggestions that the accessory belonged exclusively to Salman, according to News18. “The bracelet is not a patented accessory. If Salman feels that only he can wear it, then he should patent it. That bracelet should not be available anywhere else in the world. I completely disagree with this film or the narrative based on Salman. Our character is not Salman Khan. It’s just a movie!”The director insisted that the audience was reading too much into the visual similarities and argued that the character should not be automatically associated with the actor.Apart from the bracelet, many social media users pointed out Kashif Iqbal Khan’s overall look, claiming that his look was deliberately modeled on Salman. Bharata, however, maintained that no special effort was made to create that analogy.Comparing it to Nawazuddin Siddiqui-starrer Abhijit Panas’ Thakre, he explained that unlike biographical films where actors go through extensive transformations, no such process was used in his project. “Nawazuddin Siddiqui once played the role of Balasaheb Thackeray in a film [‘Thackeray’]. He looks like him with prosthetics and make-up. But in our film, we didn’t use any prosthetics. Our actor naturally looks like Salman.The filmmaker also said that there is little he can do about an actor’s natural look. “I can’t change her look. I couldn’t use artificial makeup on her to make her look like someone she’s not. Kya kar sakte hai? Agar kisi ko parishani ho rahi hai isse, toh ami kya bolu?”

‘Kala Hiran’ legal battle reach Delhi High Court

The matter is now out of public discussion. Salman Khan has approached the Delhi High Court seeking a stay on the release and promotion of ‘Kaala Hiran: The Battle for Legacy’. According to reports, the actor has argued through his legal team that the project contains references that violate his personality rights.The legal action comes because of elements in the film’s promotional material that Salman believes make a direct connection to him even though the makers have not used his real name.Bharat did not shy away from responding to legal proceedings. The filmmaker insists that he is not intimidated by star status in the industry. “Salman Khan is not God. He is not my godfather. He cannot stop me. He cannot destroy me and my career and neither can he build me and my career.”While he said he respects different opinions about the movie, Bharath admitted that the legal notice disappointed him because of the years of effort invested in bringing the project to life.

Bharat S Sreena called for dialogue instead of restrictions

The director insists that the films are meant to encourage discussion and debate, and so criticism is something he is willing to accept. However, he believes that attempting to close a project before the audience sees it undermines the work of an entire team. “I always welcome healthy discussion. Everyone has a point of view. Cinema is about creating conversation.”He added, “But ultimately, it will be the audience who will decide the impact and value of the film. Our film is made with the collective efforts of so many people. And now, suddenly, someone has sent us a legal notice. They are trying to stop our film. Bura to lagta hai. A lot of planning and research goes into writing and making a film. And we have been planning to make this film for several years.”Concluding his remarks, India urged Salman Khan to watch the film before reaching any conclusions about its content or intent. According to the director, taking immediate legal action without seeing the finished project ignores his development efforts.“Ek jhatke me legal notice vejna matlab shari mehnat ko rok den. He is doing this because he thinks the film is about him. He should go and see the film first and then decide.”As the dispute continues to unfold, ‘Kaala Hiran: Battle for Succession’ is increasingly at the center of legal and public debate, with both sides standing firm on their positions.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *