Actor and former AMMA Joint Secretary Ansiba Hasan His legal battle against a fellow actress got a big boost little tom. The Ernakulam Judicial First Class Magistrate Court accepted the criminal petition filed by Ansiba and asked the police to file an FIR on her complaint and investigate the case. The court took this decision after Ansiba sought its help as the police did not take any action on her previous complaint.
The court ordered the FIR after the police refused to register the case
The case arose out of Anciba’s complaint against Tina tom The statements he made were defamatory and communal in nature. As reported by English Motherland, Ansiba Hasan said that baseless allegations have been made against her, such as calling her a “jihadi” and trying to convert Tina Tom’s driver to another religion. However, after preliminary investigation and recording statements of both actors and office-bearers of the Association of Malayalam Movie Artistes (AMMA), the police concluded that there was insufficient material to register an FIR. Dissatisfied with the decision, Ansiba went to the Magistrate’s Court, which has now ordered the police to launch a formal criminal investigation.
Defamation and communal complaints are under investigation
The next step will be the investigation as per the order of the court. The police are supposed to file an FIR and look into all allegations made in the complaint, including defamation and communal comments. The investigative process involves gathering more evidence and taking more statements from those involved in the case.
The case drew attention within the Malayalam film industry
This development has generated considerable interest among members of the Malayalam film community as Ansiba Haasan and Tiny Tom are both popular industry figures associated with AMMA. The court’s decision is a landmark in the case as the matter now moves to the next level of investigation. The findings will be emphasized as soon as the police begin the investigation process.Disclaimer: Information in this report is based on legal hearings reported by third-party sources. The details provided represent allegations made by the parties involved and are not proven facts. The case is ongoing, the final decision has not been made. The publication does not claim that the allegations are true.
